Molly wrote:
QUOTE:
Please do not lecture over a simple question and someone doing their job as listed. ;)
I am not lecturing, just telling you the straight facts. Whether some factions have multis or not is a matter of what evidence you can bring forward to back the accusation. No one will go around accusing faction "x" of using multis just because "it seems" like they "might" have multis.
To answer Witold's question:
Witold, what you mentioned is subject to debate:
1. If there is another KH-playing person who has access to your account than that means its multi (even if its only sitting);
2. If the account is overtaken by a non-KH player, than he just plays the role of a sitter for you and that's all, so its not multi;
3. If you have a brother who uses the same computer in order to play KH, than Hoern will probably take it as multi simply because he can never be sure that there are indeed two real people playing the same game from the same computer. In the end it could be a single person playing two accounts, and he can't take that risk. So that may be considered multi as well, although I think Hoern might understand you in the end IF you present him with a well argumented point of view;
There are other possible situations, but which unfortunately cannot be covered because one can never know for sure if you are indeed acting as a sitter, or you use multis.