Hi,

here as little memory the basic idea:

Hadrian of Anitoh wrote:

QUOTE:
neutral diplomacy have to be in real neutral , and not to help any of sides in battle if there is no folow army option chacked

3 nations on same field , 2 are in war and 3rd is neutral for both ... 3rd nation NO BATTLE , 1st 2 fight normaly

3 nations on same field 2 are in war and 3rd is ally of 2nd and neutral for 1st ... 3rd defend ally or attack just if folow 2nd army

3 nations on same field , all are on enemy each other ... biggest atack smaller one and than rest of knights will fight with 3rd smallest army after 1st battle :)

Well, first for me to see is that Hadrian has forgotten that mainly the diplomacy to the field-owner counts

But except fighting there is much more to think about, like:

Shall nations weapon be buiable?
Right now you are able to buy a national weapon if you are in a nation with a friendly diplomatic setting, not with neutral or any other kind of "fight".

Shall the blocking-function work or not?
Right now it does... thinkable to change this or not.

Shall they be able to use the port?
Right now you should be able to attack a shire having a port, but not using it setting a fallback to sea (since you gonna be with neutral setting one of the attacker).
Think here should definetly being a change towards the "friendly" use of the port.