Recently, Borna closed a discussion about Ban's insults with this:

QUOTE:

You know this is enough... topic is locked

In future, any topic in which Ban will be presented AS ONLY PROBLEM will be locked... when you admit that you are making national insults, not to mention calling Wolfrick and Ban nazzis... and when you will be ready to talk normal and not like "everyone else is guilty only we aren't"... then we can talk, untill then: lock, lock, lock...

This simply doesn't make any sense... it just goes round and round without any smart conclusion or anything...

I specifically said SEVERAL times that the issue is not only in Ban, but that I am reporting a concrete issue, people were free to post their own proofs of offenses of other people to tend to the issue in general.
I am no investigator and cannot make up grandiose archives to accuse everyone, everywhere.

Does that mean that no crime can be reported, where Ban is the one making the crime, without knowing previous crimes of OTHER people?
It's like banning a woman of reporting a rape case, because she didn't admit that she stole a lollipop 20 years ago.

Are we treating breaking of the rules case by case or "all or nothing" principle is main on here, which you must admit, is ridiculous in Law.